Journal Home
Search for

Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages 191-199 (March 2010)

1 of 12 View next.

Recurrent bacteraemia: A 10-year regional population-based study of clinical and microbiological risk factors

Ulrich Stab JensenabCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Jenny Dahl Knudsenb, Christian Østergaardc, Kim Oren Gradelde, Niels Frimodt-Møllera, Henrik Carl Schønheyderf

Accepted 10 December 2009. published online 04 January 2010.

Summary 

Background

A population-based nested case-control study was conducted in order to characterize patient factors and microbial species associated with recurrent bacteraemia.

Methods

All patients with bacteraemia in a Danish region during 1996–2006 were investigated. Recurrence was defined based on pathogen identity, site of infection and time frame, and not restricted to homologous pathogens.

Results

We identified 8672 patients with first-time bacteraemia, of whom 1003 (12%) had a recurrence within 1year. The proportion of mono-microbial bacteraemia was similar for first (86%) and recurrent episodes (84%). An unknown focus was common in both episodes (22.7 and 29.1%, respectively). Independent predictors of a recurrence (incidence rate ratio, 95% confidence interval) included health care-associated (2.4; 1.9–3.0) and nosocomial bacteraemia (2.1; 1.8–2.6), poly-microbial Gram-positive bacteraemia (2.7; 1.6–4.6), and fungaemia (2.2; 1.4–3.5), a Charlson co-morbidity index score of 1–2 (1.7; 1.4–2.1), inappropriate empirical antimicrobial chemotherapy (1.3; 1.1–1.5), a gastro-intestinal tract focus (2.3; 1.7–3.0), a liver/biliary tract focus (2.7; 2.0–3.6), an iv-catheter focus (2.0; 1.4–2.8), endocarditis (2.7; 1.6–4.3), and an unknown focus (1.9; 1.5–2.3).

Conclusions

This study showed recurrent bacteraemia to be common and the following risk factors were identified: a health care-associated or nosocomial origin, poly-microbial or fungal aetiology, a focus within the abdomen, endocardium, iv-catheter-related or unknown, a Charlson co-morbidity index score of >1 and inappropriate empirical antimicrobial chemotherapy.

a National Center for Antimicrobials and Infection Control, Statens Serum Institut, Artillerivej 5, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark

b Department of Clinical Microbiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Kettegaard Alle 30, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark

c Department of Clinical Microbiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev Ringvej 75, 2730 Herlev, Denmark

d Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Sdr. Skovvej 15, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark

e Department of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Mølleparkvej 4, 9100 Aalborg, Denmark

f Department of Clinical Microbiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Mølleparkvej 8 A, 9100 Aalborg, Denmark

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: National Center for Antimicrobials and Infection Control, Statens Serum Institut, 5, Artillerivej (46/101), DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark. Tel.: +45 3268 8183; fax: +45 3268 3231.

PII: S0163-4453(09)00391-0

doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2009.12.007

1 of 12 View next.